<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Freelance web copywriter, web editor and content manager &#124; Concise Content &#187; SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concisecontent.co.uk/category/seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concisecontent.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:56:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A local domain name is important</title>
		<link>http://www.concisecontent.co.uk/2009/05/15/a-local-domain-name-is-important/</link>
		<comments>http://www.concisecontent.co.uk/2009/05/15/a-local-domain-name-is-important/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 16:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Localisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concisecontent.co.uk/?p=277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nomensa reports that &#8216;the .co.uk domain name is now an essential part of a company’s brand presence in the UK&#8217;, according to research by Sedo (a global domain name marketplace, funnily enough). I&#8217;m not that surprised, really. For many global companies, for example, a regional domain name is a key part of their localisation strategy. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concisecontent.co.uk/2009/05/15/a-local-domain-name-is-important/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Thoughtful, investigative pieces don&#8217;t work on the web&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.concisecontent.co.uk/2008/12/06/thoughtful-investigative-pieces-dont-work-on-the-web/</link>
		<comments>http://www.concisecontent.co.uk/2008/12/06/thoughtful-investigative-pieces-dont-work-on-the-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing style]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concisecontent.co.uk/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interesting article on the Guardian&#8217;s website today. Aida Edemariam looks at the issue of search on the internet and how this influences online writing in contrast to offline articles. This, of course, links in to how content for the web must be structured differently in general. Unfortunately, she thinks it makes &#8216;depressing reading&#8217;, interpreting [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concisecontent.co.uk/2008/12/06/thoughtful-investigative-pieces-dont-work-on-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who are you writing for?</title>
		<link>http://www.concisecontent.co.uk/2008/04/18/who-are-you-writing-for/</link>
		<comments>http://www.concisecontent.co.uk/2008/04/18/who-are-you-writing-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concisecontent.co.uk/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the first question all writers (should) ask themselves before putting finger to keyboard. When you know who you&#8217;re writing for, you can create an article that&#8217;s relevant and interesting &#8211; quality content for your readers. At the most basic level, online writers usually consider two main audiences &#8211; people and computers. Humans and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concisecontent.co.uk/2008/04/18/who-are-you-writing-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

