<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Freelance web copywriter, web editor and content manager &#124; Concise Content &#187; wcag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concisecontent.co.uk/tag/wcag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concisecontent.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:56:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Corporate websites and the case for accessibility</title>
		<link>http://www.concisecontent.co.uk/2009/03/13/corporate-websites-accessibility/</link>
		<comments>http://www.concisecontent.co.uk/2009/03/13/corporate-websites-accessibility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wcag]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concisecontent.co.uk/?p=211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As more and more companies provide and actively encourage their stakeholders to access corporate information online, accessibility is becoming an even greater issue. Accessible websites benefit everyone, both visitors and business. But research shows that many corporate websites are still failing to reach even minimum accessibility standards. Accessibility is a legal requirement for many businesses [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concisecontent.co.uk/2009/03/13/corporate-websites-accessibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mobile websites&#8230;or not?</title>
		<link>http://www.concisecontent.co.uk/2009/02/17/mobile-websites-or-not/</link>
		<comments>http://www.concisecontent.co.uk/2009/02/17/mobile-websites-or-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mwbp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[w3c]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wcag]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concisecontent.co.uk/?p=188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter has been buzzing about Jakob Nielsen&#8217;s latest Alertbox newsletter, in which he says: &#8220;To solve the problems [users experience on mobile devices], websites should provide special mobile versions.&#8221; My initial thought was that it makes sense in some cases. This is from the perspective of corporate, not e-commerce, websites, because this is where my [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concisecontent.co.uk/2009/02/17/mobile-websites-or-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

